Hillary: Deadbeat Politics Comes Home
Christmas is the season when feminist
judges and aspiring prosecutors appease
the Pink Aristocracy by rounding up all those guys who can’t afford to pay
fixed-sums of “child support” demanded to finance feminist divorce-for-the-hell-of-it.
Combine this jolly style of secular Mussolinism with
a Presidential election, and it all comes straight back down the chimney.
And now, ladies and gentlemen, the latest
thought-provoking example for your reading pleasure:
The New York Daily News
reports that Hillary’s youngest brother, Anthony Rodham, is a deadbeat
to the tune of $158,000 in child support, alimony, and interest. It is known that
Rodham is “cash strapped”, as is customary in the
majority of feminist-styled “deadbeat dad” cases.
Anthony married the
daughter of radical-feminist legislator Barbara Boxer. Needless to say, a
marriage made in pink hell will probably also end that way.
Perhaps Democrats and
Republicans alike can learn important lessons from this case. For starters:
feminism eats all men for dinner -- regardless of party affiliation – including
guys on both sides of the aisle who were stupid enough to be foot-servants or
henchmen helping feminists destroy the institution of marriage. That’s what men get
for allowing themselves to be dragged around by the male appendage.
Feminism promoted Hillary
into her unearned candidacy for President of the
This case presents a
fascinating political conundrum. Normally, judges and prosecutors often lock up
poor deadbeat hostages knowing that a close relative, usually the parents, will
cash in their retirement savings to free the hostage. With this very large
arrearage Anthony Rodham is near the top of
So why is he not writing
letters from jail right now?
If Boxer pushes for incarceration (to make Hillary and Bill pay),
the Democratic party would instantly implode. Boxer appears to be withholding her
endorsement of Hillary as the not-so-subtle wedge to push the
Deadbeat feminist politics
hurts everyone. Once
everyone realizes that child support must be ordered as a percentage of actual
income, and limited to items that actually “are” child support, we will end
entitled destruction of marriage. While most folks do not know enough to
verbalize the details, they know in the guts and soul it is wrong.
Feminist federal laws
destroy about half of all marriages regardless of one’s party affiliation or
rank in the party. The
span of entitlements enticing women to legally trade husbands like whites once
traded slaves is vast and powerful. This being the case, it is astonishing
that neither party has adopted a strong marriage values agenda in either the
congressional or Presidential races.
In
closing: a word of advice for aspiring deadbeat politicians. Anybody who shills feminist policy in the future
will have a short political career. Many prosecutors and politicians have
lost races trying to play this card. If you don’t
believe me, just ask former Senators John Ashcroft or Jim Talent what dragged
them down. Those who are running with both sides of their brains functioning
will find that Marriage Values policies will capture the minds and hearts of
the majority of voters.
Marriage Values policy will resolve the majority of Congress’s
intractable legislative problems, such as poverty and health care coverage,
which Congress can never possibly resolve via feminist approaches.
-------------------------------------------------
David R. Usher is Senior Policy Analyst
for the True Equality Network, and President of the
American Coalition for Fathers and Children, Missouri Coalition